A complete guide to preparing Digital Product Passports for fashion, footwear & apparel
Prepare for DPP with confidence
Get a personalized roadmap for digital product passport readiness tailored to your fashion, footwear, or apparel business. Start your DPP plan with us today.
Gen Z splurges on apparel more than any other discretionary category, with 34% naming it as their top area of spend in McKinsey’s State of the Consumer 2025 research. Strong demand holds even in a pressured economy, which shows that shoppers still gravitate toward products they believe offer lasting value. A growing share of that value comes from credible sustainability information, not aesthetics alone.
Moreover, research published in the Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management shows that when brands reveal how products are made or disclose responsible practices, willingness to pay rises by 2–10%. Buyers also favor suppliers that provide verified or frequently updated sustainability disclosures across materials, labor conditions, and sourcing networks.
As the Digital Product Passport advances, fashion and footwear brands face rising expectations for accurate, product-level data across multi-tier supply chains. Key considerations shaping DPP readiness include:
- Traceable material, origin, and durability data will be required across all fashion categories.
- Jewelry, footwear, and apparel will depend on specialized datasets such as ethical metal sourcing, fiber composition, and repairability.
- ESPR rules and high-impact materials will influence DPP timelines for fashion.
- Stronger visibility expectations will increase the value of verified traceability.
- Jewelry and apparel examples show how credible data strengthens trust and product value.
- PIM, PLM, and LCA will work together to manage and enrich DPP data.
- Brands already using PIM for sustainability work will gain a head start in meeting DPP requirements.
Digital Product Passport requirements for the fashion industry
EU policy is shifting how fashion and apparel products must be designed, sourced, and documented. The Circular Economy framework highlights the scale of the challenge, noting that up to 80% of a product’s environmental impact is determined at the design stage. Fashion categories carry particular weight because they rely heavily on resource-intensive materials and generate significant waste across global supply chains.
The Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) extends ecodesign rules to nearly all physical goods sold in the EU. Textiles appear among the early product groups expected to receive delegated acts, reflecting their environmental impact. Footwear has been removed from the current Ecodesign for Sustainable Products and Energy Labelling working plan 2025 – 2030, although the Commission may bring it back under the ESPR Article 5(6). ESPR introduces new expectations for durability, reparability, recycled content, and responsible material use, laying the regulatory foundation for Digital Product Passports.
Fashion and apparel brands will need to prepare for more granular data as the delegated act for textiles moves toward its indicative 2027 adoption. Key requirements include:
- Traceability data that remains accessible throughout the product’s lifetime
- Clear disclosure of substances of concern used in materials or processing
- Factory and processing details across each production stage
- Verified environmental metrics based on measured performance
- Quantified recycled and renewable content backed by supplier documentation
- Facility-level and batch-level information from upstream partners
- A publicly accessible product data record supported by QR, NFC, or URL
- Structured information that supports reuse, repair, and recycling programs
Digital Product Passport data types: Jewelry
High-value pieces demand precise tracking from the moment raw materials are sourced. DPPs bring that level of visibility into one place, providing a verified chain of custody for metals and stones and a clear record of how each piece was made.
This foundation strengthens responsible sourcing claims and supports product stories built on quality and transparency.
Jewelry DPP data requirements
| Data category | Description |
|---|---|
| Product identification | Unique ID, SKU, model number, and batch/serial number. |
| Material composition | Detailed list of metals (gold, silver, platinum) and gemstones (diamonds, sapphires), including weights and purity (e.g., 18K gold, VS1 clarity). |
| Material origin | Geographic and ethical sourcing details for metals and stones (e.g., conflict-free diamonds, recycled gold). |
| Manufacturing information | Location and date of manufacture, artisan or brand name, and production methods (hand-crafted, cast). |
| Certifications | Ethical and quality certifications (Kimberley Process, RJC, Fairmined, hallmarking). |
| Environmental impact | Carbon footprint, water usage, and energy consumption during production. |
| Repair & maintenance | Instructions for care, cleaning, repair, and records of alterations. |
| Ownership history | Provenance and chain of custody, especially for high-value or vintage pieces. |
| End-of-life guidance | Recycling or resale options, disassembly instructions for material recovery. |
| Traceability data | Full supply chain traceability from mine to market. |
| Digital access method | QR code, NFC, or RFID tag embedded in packaging or certificate. |
Final Digital Product Passport requirements for jewelry have not yet been set and will depend on future delegated acts or horizontal rules introduced under ESPR.
Digital Product Passport data types: Clothing and apparel
Apparel products move through complex global supply chains long before they reach your customer. A Digital Product Passport helps capture that journey in one clear record, enabling verified material data, transparent sourcing details, and reliable care and repair guidance.
Clothing and apparel DPP data requirements
| Data category | Description |
|---|---|
| Product identification | Unique Product ID, SKU, and batch number to track the item across its lifecycle. |
| Material composition | Detailed breakdown of fibers and materials used, including percentages and blends. |
| Material origin | Geographic source of raw materials (e.g., cotton from India, wool from New Zealand). |
| Manufacturing information | Factory location(s), production date, and processing stages. |
| Certifications | Sustainability and ethical certifications (GOTS, OEKO-TEX®, Fair Trade). |
| Environmental impact | Metrics such as carbon footprint, water usage, and chemical usage. |
| Care instructions | Washing, drying, and ironing guidelines to extend product life. |
| Repair information | Guidance on how to repair the item, including compatible materials or services. |
| End-of-life guidance | Recycling or reuse options, disassembly instructions, and disposal recommendations. |
| Traceability data | Supply chain traceability from raw material to finished product. |
| Digital access method | QR code, NFC, or RFID tag linking to the digital passport. |
Digital Product Passport data types: Footwear
Footwear products involve layered materials, complex construction methods, and multi-tier supply chains. These characteristics make component-level data essential for any future Digital Product Passport model.
Brands still benefit from structuring footwear data, especially as supplier documentation, chemical reporting, and responsible material sourcing continue to gain importance across the EU.
Below is the footwear data model you can use to prepare proactively, even though footwear is not included in the 2025–2030 ESPR Working Plan.
Footwear DPP data requirements (preparation model)
| Data category | Description |
|---|---|
| Product identification | Unique ID, SKU, model number, size runs, batch/serial identifiers. |
| Component breakdown | Upper, lining, midsole, outsole materials, adhesives, reinforcements. |
| Material composition | Leather types, textiles, polymers, recycled content, percentage breakdown. |
| Manufacturing information | Facilities used across cutting, lasting, assembly, and finishing. |
| Chemical disclosures | Restricted substances, adhesives, coatings, dye systems. |
| Environmental impact | Carbon footprint, water use, energy consumption, and microplastic indicators. |
| Durability & testing | Flex tests, abrasion resistance, and sole bonding tests. |
| Repair & maintenance | Replaceable components, refurbishment guidance, and aftercare. |
| End-of-life guidance | Disassembly notes, recycling compatibility, and material recovery. |
| Traceability data | Supplier and sub-supplier information at the component level. |
| Digital access method | QR code, NFC tag, RFID label. |
Digital Product Passport timeline for the fashion industry
The updated ESPR Working Plan provides the clearest view yet of when Digital Product Passports will apply to different product groups. For fashion, the most crucial change is that textiles and apparel now have an indicative adoption year of 2027, confirmed as a priority product group with high environmental impact.
Footwear, however, was removed from the 2025-2030 plan. The Commission notes that footwear has lower impacts than the prioritized final products and will instead undergo a separate study, to be completed by the end of 2027. Under Article 5(6) of the ESPR, the Commission can still introduce ecodesign requirements for products outside the working plan at any time.
Delegated acts will establish the final Digital Product Passport rules for each product group. These acts define the binding requirements, the scope of information, and the enforcement timeline. Until these acts are adopted, all dates remain indicative.
The working plan outlines a five-year cycle from 2025-2030, with a mid-term review in 2028.
Indicative EU milestones for fashion and apparel
- 2025-2026
Preparatory studies and consultations are beginning to shape DPP-related ecodesign requirements for textiles and apparel. - 2027 (Indicative adoption year)
The Commission intends to adopt the delegated act for textiles and apparel, setting out the specific ecodesign and information requirements for the category. These requirements must include material composition, substances of concern, and information to support safe use, recycling, and disposal. - 2028 (Mid-term review)
The Commission reviews the working plan, assesses market readiness, and may add or reintroduce product groups. Footwear is a candidate for reassessment. - 2029-2030
Progressive implementation phases begin across product categories with adopted delegated acts. Specific enforcement dates for textiles and apparel will be set only in the delegated act itself. Additional product groups, such as mattresses and light sources, will see adoption dates between 2029 and 2030, illustrating the broader rollout pace.
Why product traceability matters for consumers and partners
Shoppers want clearer, verifiable information about how clothing, footwear, and accessories are made. Trust rises when brands share transparent details tied to actual production steps, not general sustainability statements. Research shows that most consumers question the accuracy of environmental claims, and many are more willing to pay when information is both measurable and verified.
Retailers and partners rely on the same level of clarity. Verified product data reduces compliance risks, supports responsible sourcing programs, and creates consistency across multi-brand assortments.
The updated ESPR Working Plan also confirms that Digital Product Passports will support traceability after a product enters the market, ensuring that verified data remains available for repair, resale, or recycling over the product’s full lifetime.
57%
of consumers don’t trust most sustainability claims brands make
49%
question the authenticity of sustainability claims
62%
are willing to pay a 20% premium when they trust the information provided
54%
want brands to share clear facts explaining why a product is sustainable
Jewellery product traceability case study
A global luxury house recently outlined how traceability is reshaping its fine jewelry strategy. In a Fairly Made panel, its digital leader explained that verified material data helps create a more personal product experience by giving customers clear proof of quality and responsible sourcing. The brand treats traceability as a value driver, using it to strengthen buyer confidence and deepen the emotional connection to each piece.
One of its recent collections applies this approach, using certified recycled gold and a specialized diamond supplier that documents every stage of the supply chain. A blockchain-based verification system completes the experience, letting customers confirm origin and production details with certainty.
Growing expectations in the jewelry sector point in the same direction. Buyers want transparent product stories that stay consistent across channels, which requires accurate, structured product data. Strong product experience management and reliable product-level traceability provide the foundation for delivering those insights at scale.
Clothing Digital Product Passport case study: Early adopter example
A UK-based fashion brand has been piloting Digital Product Passports since 2023, starting with small capsule drops and denim programs before expanding across its supplier network. The brand shared its Digital Product Passport journey, outlining how it progressed from early pilots to more than 100 styles, collected 140+ data points across multiple partners, and recorded over 20,000 customer scans. Its next milestone is ambitious: make every Autumn/Winter 2025 garment scannable, with each piece carrying a QR code linked to verified product data.
The brand also offered a leadership perspective on scaling Digital Product Passports, noting that each product requires more than 100 data points and deeper collaboration with suppliers. Teams had to guide partners through new expectations, track fiber origins and energy sources, and manage the logistics of assigning and integrating unique QR codes across all SKUs.
Customers benefit directly from this work. Scannable garments reveal material origins, environmental impact, and care and repair details, supporting a more transparent and circular product experience.
PIM and the Digital Product Passport for the fashion industry
A connected product data foundation maintains accurate material details, certifications, and environmental metrics as they move across teams. Digital Product Passports will introduce even more granular data requirements, and fashion brands will need systems that work together to collect, verify, and surface this information across the whole product lifecycle.
Fashion businesses face two data pressures. Upstream, teams must collect highly detailed information from suppliers, including material processing, finishing, factories used at every stage, carbon footprint, chemical disclosures, and recyclability metrics. Downstream, brands must publish a publicly accessible product data record through QR codes, RFID tags, or URLs, and keep that information available for as long as the product remains in use.
PIM plays a key role as a data provider within this ecosystem. It centralizes verified, customer-facing product information and connects with PLM, ERP, LCA tools, and other systems that supply deeper, component-level data.
In some cases, future data providers may also include repair shops or recycling centers when a product becomes a “SKU of one” through refurbishment or resale. Aligning these systems ensures complete, verifiable Digital Product Passport information from design through downstream consumer access.
How core product data systems connect to create and maintain Digital Product Passport data
Digital Product Passports rely on data from multiple systems that manage different stages of a product’s lifecycle. ERP, PLM, and supplier platforms record sourcing, processing, certifications, and manufacturing details.
PIM centralizes and structures customer-facing product information and supports the batch and SKU-level data used in DPPs. A DPP platform or data record ledger brings these inputs together, hosts the public product record, and connects QR codes or GS1 links to live information.
When these systems work in sync, brands gain a consistent, traceable data flow that accurately reflects each product as regulations evolve.
| System | Primary role | DPP contribution | Data types managed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ERP / PLM / supplier systems | Records sourcing, procurement, supply, and manufacturing data | Adds and handles facility data, energy sources, raw material extraction details, manufacturin,g and compliance documentation down to the serialized level | Supplier IDs, production sites, material certifications, processing data |
| PIM (Product Information Management) | Centralizes, orchestrates, optimizes, and localizes all product information for DPP and beyond | PIM is the backbone for structuring, governing, and syndicating customer-facing data, which is a majority of the product data that fuels DPP on Batch and SKU level | Product attributes, identifiers, consumer-facing data, and material claims, certifications, care instructions |
| DPP Platform / Data record Ledger | Summarizing all DPP data and hosting commercial landing pages for Customer visualization | Pulling in / mirroring the relevant DPP data per product from Upstream data providers, creating and handling QR codes, including GS1 links | All updated DPP data and associated branded attributes are being visualized here from |
Footwear and clothing brands using the Inriver PIM to drive sustainability initiatives
PIM solutions, such as Inriver, are part of a broader product data ecosystem, and many fashion brands use them to improve the accuracy and consistency of the information needed to support traceability and sustainability programs.
Fjällräven
Uses structured product data to support responsible material choices and document the sustainability attributes of its outdoor apparel. Their PIM foundation helps maintain accuracy as products move through design, sourcing, and long-term durability programs.

– Jenne Maes
Global PIM Manager, Fjällräven
New Balance
Centralizes global product information to ensure consistent data across regions and channels. Their teams rely on accurate, enriched product content to support responsible manufacturing and deliver precise, reliable product details to partners and consumers.

– John Fister
Senior Digital Product Manager, New Balance
Pandora
Connects sourcing, certification, and component-level details for its jewelry collections. Their PIM-driven approach strengthens traceability for metals and gemstones and supports transparency expectations tied to responsible materials.

– Isabel Marschall Thostrup
E-commerce Specialist, Pandora
Carhartt
Uses scalable product information operations to manage detailed product data across a complex supply chain. Their teams depend on PIM to maintain accuracy around materials, specifications, and care information as they expand sustainability efforts.

– Melissa Dyke
Product Data Information Data Steward, Carhartt
See the Inriver PIM in action
Inriver offers the most comprehensive PIM solution on the market, built for speed, scale, and complexity. Let an Inriver expert explain how the Inriver PIM can turn your product data flows into a sustainable revenue stream.
- Get a personalized, guided demo of the Inriver platform
- Have all your PIM questions answered
- Free consultation, zero commitment
Thanks for reaching out!
We’ll be in touch soon.
Please try again in a moment.
Frequently asked questions
Digital Product Passports apply to product groups selected via ESPR-delegated acts. Textiles and apparel have an indicative adoption year of 2027. Other groups will follow as their delegated acts are released. Categories already regulated under the Energy Labelling Framework will not receive DPPs. Footwear is not included in the 2025-2030 Working Plan.
DPPs provide shoppers with verified information on materials, processing steps, and environmental impact. This reduces uncertainty behind sustainability claims and builds trust across apparel, footwear, and accessory categories.
DPPs link a product to a digital record through a QR code, NFC tag, or URL. This keeps verified information accessible throughout the product’s lifetime, enabling traceability long after it reaches the market.
Apparel brands will need to document detailed fiber composition, substances of concern, production processes, environmental metrics, and care or repair guidance. Final requirements will be set in the delegated act for textiles.
Footwear is currently outside the 2025-2030 EC Working Plan. Brands can still prepare voluntarily by building structured material, component, and traceability data models. Any future footwear requirements would be defined through a separate delegated act.
DPP data helps enable repair, resale, refurbishment, and recycling by providing reliable information on materials, components, and construction. This supports longer product life and more circular product flows across apparel, footwear, and accessories.
DPPs apply to products sold in the EU, regardless of where they are made. Most global fashion brands plan to use the same data model across markets to maintain consistent product information, simplify compliance, and avoid managing separate data workflows for different regions.
